WeWork and Theranos – what will we be taught? – Hemant R Joshi

A number of weeks in the past, I completed studying a guide referred to as “Billion Greenback Loser” – a guide concerning the epic catastrophe at WeWork. The corporate, which was going to IPO at a valuation of $47bn as soon as, was valued at lower than $10bn weeks later, and likewise determined to not IPO.

Proper after, I noticed a documentary about one other firm referred to as Theranos, one other colossal startup failure.

Each of those made me surprise concerning the motivations of founders. What was it they have been actually wanting that they stored rising their firms regardless of not having a enterprise that labored?

What precisely occurred?

Theranos, based in 2003 was a startup “revolutionizing” blood assessments as we all know them. The corporate was constructing a tool that would conduct greater than 200 blood assessments with only a few drops of blood, as an alternative of the test-tubes filled with blood that’s collected at present in blood testing centres. The corporate claimed it required only one/100 of the quantity of blood that will ordinarily be wanted.

At its peak, the corporate was valued at $10bn {dollars}.

However there was an issue. The corporate didn’t have a working product! It was all a rip-off. And what’s extra attention-grabbing is that the corporate managed to persuade giants like Walgreens (a big pharmacy chain within the US) to be its early prospects.

As increasingly individuals began popping out and telling that issues weren’t how they appeared, investigations began in 2016. The corporate turned defunct in 2018.

WeWork was a distinct sport altogether. WeWork is an organization that rents actual property to freelancers, small companies and enterprises – a contemporary idea referred to as co-working areas. The founders of WeWork all the time talked about that they weren’t renting actual property, however have been constructing a “world neighborhood” of staff. They claimed the corporate was a tech firm, however actually, it was an actual property enterprise that didn’t scale very effectively. But, they have been in a position to get to a sky-high valuation of $47bn once they filed their paperwork for IPO.

Weeks later, because the investigators began poking holes into their IPO paperwork, the onion began getting peeled. The corporate lied on its financials, was dropping rather more cash than it said, and it didn’t have a lot of a “tech operation.” Consequently, the corporate determined to again off from its IPO. Later, the buyers within the firm determined to oust its CEO, who bought $1.7bn to get away from the corporate. WHAT?

The issue, in each the circumstances, lay on the prime – the founders.

In regards to the founders

Each Elizabeth Holmes (Theranos) and Adam Neumann (WeWork) appeared nice at promoting. Elizabeth persistently motivated her staff to assume that that they had a breakthrough product, even when the workers knew they didn’t have a lot going. Adam was in a position to persuade buyers that the corporate was a tech operation, and was constructing a bodily social neighborhood, type of like Fb or Twitter, however in actual areas. Actual property simply occurred to be part of the enterprise.

Each of them appeared a bit of delusional – Elizabeth believing that what she was doing was good for the world, whereas Adam pondering that he was genuinely constructing a world neighborhood that would assist one another. However, how might they not truthfully take a look at the world round them? In a single case, the product didn’t work (and this was blood assessments – the accuracy of medical studies is of supreme essential. One mistake and you would kill individuals). Within the different case, the corporate was spending an excessive amount of cash and didn’t present any worth on the neighborhood facet. Certain, they may have had the suitable intentions at begin, however later, how might they be delusional when elevating increasingly cash? It appeared like they have been chasing larger valuations, and never sound companies.

Each of them have been unafraid of mendacity in public. Theranos, for instance, made a declare that they have been making $100mn in income once they have been actually making $100k. WeWork got here with its personal manner of calculating EBITDA, calling it the “neighborhood adjusted EBITDA”.

[EBITDA = the money a company makes before taxes]

What concerning the buyers?

Enterprise capitalists (VCs) need to take enormous bets with little or no knowledge. It’s assumed that in the event you spend money on 20 startups, only one or 2 are going to succeed and others are going to fail. However the returns on these 1 or 2 are 10x, 20x, and even larger, which cowl up for the losses with the opposite corporations.

In enterprise capital, you can’t spend money on any firm you need, like you possibly can within the inventory market. You could get permissions from founders with a purpose to make investments. As such, there’s an excellent demand amongst VCs for investing within the prime startups, whereas different startups don’t see any responses to their funding pitches.

Within the case of WeWork, one thing related occurred. One standard agency determined to speculate, contemplating how Adam Neumann was in a position to persuade them of his imaginative and prescient. Because of this funding, many extra individuals adopted. Ultimately, the whale within the ocean – Softbank, determined to spend money on WeWork. And Softbank was able to go daring and make investments billions of {dollars} within the firm.

Nevertheless it appeared like diligence was lacking. Desperation of the buyers to get in on a “fast-growing firm” was larger than the persistence required for diligence.

A quote about WeWork from the guide:

“These individuals invested, they knew the phrases, they knew concerning the governance points, and so they instructed this man, ‘Be you, however be ten instances you.’ What did they count on?”

Billion Greenback Loser

To present the buyers credit score, I believe this can be a actually laborious sport they’re enjoying and such misses can occur.

They will display for “mental honesty” to an extent, however are in all probability not going to know somebody’s inside motivations totally. In each the circumstances, it’s clear that the founders have been enthusiastic about their firms, however they weren’t sincere.

This to me looks as if the core challenge right here.

Certain, as founders, you’re visionaries. You chase visions that folks don’t consider in, perhaps for years, however mendacity isn’t the answer. You’ll be able to say your enterprise isn’t working at the moment, however you may have a plan to make it work. However saying that your enterprise goes nice simply to boost your valuations is problematic.

In conclusion, what I’ve learnt is scamming isn’t that tough. All of it boils right down to how sincere you’re.


  1. Billion Greenback Loser – the story of WeWork – guide hyperlink
  2. The Inventor: Out for blood in Silicon Valley – the story of Theranos – documentary
  3. Theranos – Wikipedia
  4. WeWork’s IPO catastrophe – Vox

In case you’re fascinated with receiving extra tales just like the above, please put in your e mail right here and I’ll share them with you. I don’t ship any spam, promise ?

Related Articles


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles